
Stans 1481 – perhaps that’s us
Five years of acrimonious struggle, city-cantons versus rural cantons, six attempts at a resolution, and finally an agreement stamped with the seals of the eight old towns, valid at the same time for the two new ones, Fribourg and Solothurn. It’s pretty special. It’s probably part of who we are, even now. A derivation with possible interpretations.
But once again, Uri, Schwyz and Unterwalden got in the way. In order to be admitted to the Confederacy, Fribourg and Solothurn had to accept restrictions on their rights. So back they all went to Stans. Negotiations commenced on 18 December, and agreement was reached on the 22nd. An arduous process for all involved. Typically confederate, Swiss? Could well be. Here’s the backstory.
Burgundy. Bern. War
Several days later a Bernese commander led the anti-Burgundian league, on campaign to the Free County of Burgundy (Franche-Comté), to victory over a Burgundian army at Héricourt. 16 enemy leaders were taken to Basel and publicly burned at the stake. “Der Alte Schweizer und sein Krieg” – a glorious history?
The following year, Bern and Fribourg, encouraged by Lucerne, had bands of fighters move into western Switzerland. These groups swiftly captured 16 cities and 43 castles. Everywhere, they forced people to swear the oath of allegiance.
For the time being, the other Swiss towns distanced themselves from Bern’s ruthless expansion. In the looming war, they only hastened to Bern’s aid at the last moment. According to the mnemonic, the only casualty was the noble duke: “Karl der Kühne verliert bei Grandson das Gut, bei Murten den Mut, bei Nancy das Blut” (Charles the Bold lost his goods at Grandson, his mettle at Murten, his blood at Nancy). It wasn’t like that.


Jerusalem in the West
On the first map Atlas makes the sun rise and set; on the second Affrica, Asia and Europa are placed in situ. The third map focuses on Europe: the Alps between Italia, Alamania and Gallia. On the fourth map, the incredible happens: Bonstetten places the Rigi in the centre of the world and surrounds it with the eight old towns of the Swiss Confederacy. The work was completed, the “usserwelte” peoples of the Confederacy in the centre of the globe.
Bands of fighters
The gravity of the situation can be gauged by the fact that the cities were doing everything they could to halt this procession. Negotiators from Bern, Geneva, Basel and Strasbourg hastened to placate the belligerent mobs, which had already reached Payerne and Lausanne. Efforts were made to woo the “Gesellschaft vom torechten Leben”. Geneva was forced to hand over the contents of all its coffers. Finally, four barrels of wine were carted in at the city’s expense and each member of the company was given two Gulden in cash. The undertaking was abandoned – a big U-turn.
A split?
The Kolbenbannerzug, the club banner campaign, prompted Bern, Lucerne and Zurich to form an alliance, known as a Städtebund, with Fribourg and Solothurn, both of which were not yet part of the Confederacy in 1477. The citizens of each individual city thus also became citizens of the other four cities. This led to fierce disputes with the five Landorte, the rural cantons, especially with Uri, Schwyz and Unterwalden. Because of its Landsgemeinde or “cantonal assembly”, Zug counted as a Landort. After a tough battle, and thanks also to the mediation of Brother Klaus, a solution was found at the Tagsatzung in Stans in December 1481. Kurt Messmer / Swiss National Museum
Squaring the circle
The sticking point was the admission of Fribourg and Solothurn to the Confederacy. To begin with, the two cities were still envisaged as co-signatories of the charter, but by the end of 1481, at the urging of the three inner towns, this was no longer the case. The Treaty of Stans was authenticated only with the seals of the eight old towns – leaving out Fribourg and Solothurn.
One of the keys to success was that both sides saved face. The rural cantons pushed through a ruling that the Städtebund was to be dissolved. In return, the city-cantons achieved their aim of having Fribourg and Solothurn admitted to the Swiss Confederacy. A major accomplishment. “Stans 1481” represents a compromise in the spirit of Niklaus von Flüe, the country’s national saint.
Power cartel
The political bylaws in force were very effective. “Wilful violence” was prohibited. Subjects were not permitted to assemble without the consent of the authorities. This seriously limited their scope for political action. However, should there be resistance or open “apostasy”, the governing regimes mutually undertook to provide military assistance.
Then. Now. Five possible interpretations
Secondly – City and country are dependent on one another. Nevertheless, they are in a state of latent tension, up to the present day. It’s inevitable that cracks in the woodwork will appear from time to time. Overcoming differences and achieving a viable working relationship is crucial. As a basic approach, there is no alternative.
Third – Majority and minority are political twins. Both watch suspiciously, certain that they’re always being short-changed. According to the unwritten rule, the minority must be respected. But there’s an exception to every rule.
Fourth – The main drivers in the political tug-of-war are public spirit and self-interest. Public spirit has a tougher time, trying to keep self-interest within limits. Above all, knee-jerk responses and short-lived actions that undermine the public good should be avoided. The chances of success are there, but it’s not guaranteed.
Fifth – The Swiss all-purpose tool is compromise, the trade-off, the art of the possible. In 1481, a willingness to make compromises led to the ultimate solution. It’s also essential in consociational democracy. However, compromises come in 1481 shades.
Question – What about our mental collective characteristics? Do they, over centuries, have an impact on our political thinking and actions? How do collective identities develop in a country like Switzerland, which long ago moved from being a country people left to being a country people immigrate to? It’s all complicated, difficult, uncertain. But all the same, Stans 1481 – perhaps that’s us.


