
Resistance and vanity
As a general, Henri Guisan led Switzerland through World War II. His public image alternated between resistance and diligent personal propagandisation.
In 1941 Swiss Nazis, whose phones had been tapped, were planning to kill Guisan. Understandably, since the Rütli Report of 1940, the Commander-in-Chief of the Swiss Army had become a symbol of resistance. However, you can only kill a person if you know where he’s going to be. So there were good reasons to keep the General’s command posts in Spiez, Gümligen, Interlaken and Jegenstorf as secret as his little apartment on the Schänzlihalde in Bern.
News reports or photographs showing the General at his various locations were not welcome. In addition, Henri Guisan was not to be used for commercial purposes. Therefore, from 1940 to 1942, the following provisions were inserted into Swiss emergency press law in several stages (Note 8c of the Compendium of Swiss emergency press law):
Whereabouts of the General
The following are prohibited:
Advance announcements of visits and journeys by the General including inspection and approval of parades, unless such notice has been approved by the General himself or a delegated officer.
Any use of the General’s person for advertising purposes, e.g. for publicity for performances by army concert parties etc., is prohibited.
Advertising segments featuring depictions of the General and of other high-ranking officers are subject to prior censorship.


The General’s secret diplomacy
There was also a little bit of propagandisation
What else? Some elements of vanity can be noted in the portrayal of Guisan. More problematic, albeit to some extent understandable, was the distrust which the Commander-in-Chief felt towards the Federal Council. But neither was a decisive factor. Cherishing beauty is certainly not a crime. For my part, I am in full agreement with the TV viewers who have chosen the great man from Vaud as what he is, and probably always will be: the Romand du siècle.




